For the ladies in the MG Fandom
I’m not into that game series, so I don’t know what to say. But drama over a bikini? Really?
the year is 2015
kojima is having another trailer release for the phantom pain
a lone fan in the crowd raises his hand, defeat and exhaustion already etched in his face
"Mr. Kojima, please… What’s the release date?" he asks, visibly pained.
"The release date was yesterday." Kojima replies, to stunned silence. It was a phantom release.
OUR SKYPE CHAT IS EXPLODING RITE NAO
QUIET HUMMING IS TOP TIER. QUIET CONFIRMED WAIFU OF ALL TIME. 2QT4ME
ALSO DAT MGS1 SNEAKING SUIT LOOK-ALIKE/PROTOTYPE
FUCKING GAS (BALLOON) SNAKE TO THE RESCUE
QUIET HUMMING WAS THE CUTEST THING THO, CAN WE CONTINUE TALKING ABOUT THIS??? I GOT THE DIABETES FROM ALL THAT SWEETNESS
Anita Sarkeesian started Tropes vs Women, made 16x what her original Kickstarter cost, produced 20% of what she promised, and it’s almost 2 years past her promised due date. She stole Artwork and Gameplay footage without permission nor credit, she blocks and ignores all forms of criticism on her youtube and twitter, and created a fake account to victimize herself and posted the proof that she was lying about it on her own twitter.
Zoe Quinn is a game developer who created a simple text adventure Browser game “Depression Quest”, used the Suicide of Robin Williams as a selling tool for her game, had sexual relations with 5 different gaming journalists who “coincidentally” gave her nearly unknown game good ratings, as well as having sexual relations with her manager. She also “hacked” her own twitter and tumblr, blaming 4chan for her actions. She claims she is being victimized because she cheated on her boyfriend [which she admitted, in her own opinion, is rape, btw] which has nothing to do with Gaming Journalism, but she was actually being criticized for “sleeping for reviews” which is corruption in journalism, and thats what started the whole #GamerGate business.
Also, Zoe Quinn attacked and Doxxed the leader(?) of The Fine Young Capitalists, [an organization entirely made of WOMEN, whom plan on developing games designed by WOMEN for WOMEN, as well as charity] because she felt the organization was Sexist and Misogynistic.
anita sarkeesian has critics (sorry, “critics”) who automatically dismiss the harassment she undergoes because she’s a victim. and I’m unsure what women are supposed to? are we supposed to never mention that we’re suffering or in pain in order for our pain to be valid? is there some sort of peer review that’ll swoop in and broadcast that harm was done and only then do we escape the label of “victim” as this sort of sin?
She is not a victim. She is a scam artist, art theif, and made false threats against herself.
Here’s an image of her refusing $1000 in donations, in return for proof of her police report (which does not exist, please prove me wrong, I dare you)